Message-ID: <29476004.1075842215530.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 16:28:00 -0800 (PST)
From: crb0@pge.com
To: dan.hyvl@enron.com
Subject: RE: Enron Canada
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: "Baxter, Charlotte" <CRB0@pge.com>
X-To: Dan J Hyvl
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Dan_Hyvl_Dec2000_June2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: HYVL-D
X-FileName: dhyvl.nsf

Dan:
I will await receipt of the Enron US Agreement.

May I prepare/mail you the same for :
ENRON CANADA CORPORATION
Agreement #5763 - Effective October 1, 1999

Address:  3500 Canterra Tower
               400 - 3rd Avenue S.W.
               Calgary, Alberta, Canada  T2P 4H2
(403) 974-6700
Fax: (403) 974-6706

Charlotte
> ----------
> From:  Dan J Hyvl[SMTP:dhyvl@ect.enron.com]
> Sent:  Friday, January 07, 2000 6:44 AM
> To:  Baxter, Charlotte
> Subject:  Re: PG&E-Enron rewrite 11.4
>
>
>
> Charlotte,
>      With the changes made to 11.4, I believe that we can delete the
> proposed
> changes to 16.3.  Do you agree?  If so please update the ENA contract that
> I
> forward you last month.  Once we have that in final form, I will give you
> the
> name and addresses for the Enron Canada Corp. agreement.
>
>
>
>
> "Baxter, Charlotte" <CRB0@pge.com> on 01/06/2000 06:56:19 PM
>
> To:   Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
> cc:
> Subject:  PG&E-Enron rewrite 11.4
>
>
>
> Dan:
> How about this?
>
> 11.4 (2nd paragraph rewrite)
> > Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Article 11.5, in the event
> > that a Force Majeure properly noticed by one Party under Article 11.2
> (and
> > causing the failure to purchase or sell Gas), results in the imposition
> by
> > a Transporter on the other Party of Imbalance Charges or Operational
> Flow
> > Order (OFO) or Emergency Flow Order (EFO) noncompliance charges or
> similar
> > charges, the Party providing the notice shall reimburse the other Party
> > for such charges to the extent the other Party, within a reasonable time
> > period after receiving notice of Force Majeure is unable, consistent
> with
> > the tariffs or procedures of the affected Transporter(s), to revise or
> > correct its nominations in order to reflect the Force Majeure event or
> > occurence.
> >
> Do you wish to keep the changes we proposed in fax in 16.3 or delete?
>
> If this works, I will prepare 2 finals (US & Canada).  Let me know.
> thanks,
> charlotte
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 